Now that we have identified the strengths and weaknesses of outsourced and in-house accounting, it’s time to weigh the pros and cons to understand which option is more suitable. The following factors need to be analyzed.
If you plan to recruit full-time employees, you must be interested in their experience and reputation with former employers. Verification is necessary when hiring a financial specialist; otherwise, you risk encountering self-taught employees, increasing the company’s risks.
The contract-out services comprehend generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and provide higher accounting services quality and experience. Employees of third-party organizations are professionals who are constantly trained in bookkeeping and technology, that is proved by certification.
Every firm is concerned about business costs, and in-house and outsourced accounting expenditures vary greatly.
The average annual income of an accountant in 2023 in the USA was $62,384, and the standard wage of a bookkeeper was $44,035. Be prepared not only to pay for their activity but also to face various overhead spending, which amount to about 20% of the specialist’s base salary:
If you outsource your bookkeeping, you must pay for the services, but various overhead expenditures are not considered. The annual cost of accounting in an outsourcing company’s services often increases with the complications of the operation, but for small firms, it rarely exceeds $5,000. It makes outsourcing a more profitable option than hiring an in-house specialist.
Full-time workers typically work from 9 to 5, that is, 40 hours a week. It means when specialists are in the office, they are actively working, but after 5, any urgent questions are postponed until the next working day.
At the same time, outsourcing organizations often work 24/7 or at least a few extra hours. It is essential for businesses operating during the evening and night, including cafes, web service developers, cinemas, etc.
According to statistics, 22 to 28% of enterprises experience fraud among staff. Moreover, corporate scams are more likely to affect firms where the staff are older; the more likely they are to commit fraud, the greater the volume of fraud will be. The complication of commercial procedures can help unscrupulous personnel hide dishonesty.
When delegating bookkeeping, such situations are observed less frequently for several reasons. As a rule, outsourcing firms have auditors who guarantee fraud prevention. They are concerned about customer loyalty since introducing fraudulent schemes can lead to the bankruptcy of an economic organization.
The decision between outsourcing and on-site accounting depends on many factors. Outsourced economic services let you save working hours, gain access to expertise, and provide savings, while full-time bookkeeping guarantees internal monitoring. It is essential to carefully analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each option to make a rational decision.
If you want to take advantage of outsourcing accounting services and improve your operations, we recommend contacting BooksTime. Our experts go beyond standard accounting and analyze all business transactions to create the optimal economic process. We have no plans to repeat what has been done before – we will look for ways to improve actively, all for a reasonable monthly fee!
This article is not intended to provide tax, legal, or investment advice, and BooksTime does not provide any services in these areas. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon for tax, legal, or investment purposes. These topics are complex and constantly changing. The information presented here may be incomplete or out of date. Be sure to consult a relevant professional. BooksTime is not responsible for your compliance or noncompliance with any laws or regulations.
A bookkeeping expert will contact you during business hours to discuss your needs.